Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Opinions about Visiting Forces Agreement

The Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) is a treaty between the United States and the Philippines that governs the treatment of US military personnel in the Philippines. The agreement was signed in February 1998 and has been a point of controversy and debate ever since.

The VFA allows US military personnel to enter and exit the Philippines without visas and provides them with certain privileges and immunities, including exemption from passport and visa regulations, customs duties, and taxes. Supporters of the VFA argue that it serves as a deterrent against external threats to the Philippines and helps strengthen the country`s defense capabilities. They also point out that the agreement has been instrumental in facilitating joint military exercises and disaster relief efforts between the two countries.

However, critics of the VFA argue that it violates Philippine sovereignty and undermines the country`s ability to pursue an independent foreign policy. They also point to the numerous incidents involving US soldiers that have sparked outrage and increased anti-American sentiment in the Philippines. One such incident involved the rape of a Filipina by several US Marines in 2005, which led to widespread protests and calls to scrap the VFA.

The debate over the VFA has been reignited in recent years, particularly in light of the changing geopolitical landscape in the Asia-Pacific region and the rise of China. Some analysts argue that the VFA is necessary to counter China`s assertiveness in the South China Sea, while others argue that it is a relic of the Cold War era and no longer serves any useful purpose.

Despite the controversy surrounding the VFA, it remains in effect and continues to be a point of contention between the United States and the Philippines. As opinions on the agreement continue to diverge, it remains to be seen whether the VFA will be renegotiated or scrapped altogether.